AI evaluation domain · 16 source-backed records
Multimodal and Voice AI Benchmarks
Multimodal and voice evals add perception, timing, interaction, and media quality to ordinary language-model evaluation. End-to-end latency and recoverability often matter as much as semantic accuracy.
Decision guidance
How should multimodal and voice agents be evaluated?
Measure perception and task completion separately, then add end-to-end checks for latency, interruptions, turn taking, tool use, channel noise, accessibility, and graceful recovery from misunderstood input.
16
Benchmarks in this domain Sources first · alphabetical collection order
Runnability describes access to a usable repository, dataset, or harness—not whether setup is easy.
Tests End-to-end voice-agent evaluation framework for realistic simulated conversations and voice-specific failure modes.
Best for Voice-agent quality beyond transcripts
Classification benchmark · emerging · mixed
MathVista recommended runnable
2026-07-15
Tests Mathematical reasoning over visual inputs.
Best for Visual math reasoning
Classification benchmark · current · open
MM-BrowseComp watch partial
2026-07-15
Tests Emerging multimodal browsing benchmark for web tasks where visual context matters.
Best for Multimodal browsing agents
Classification benchmark · emerging · mixed
MMBench recommended runnable
2026-07-15
Tests Broad multimodal model evaluation suite.
Best for General VLM comparison
Classification benchmark · current · open
MMMU / MMMU-Pro recommended runnable
2026-07-15
Tests Expert multimodal reasoning where images materially affect the answer.
Best for Vision-language reasoning
Classification benchmark · current · open
MultiVox specialized partial
2026-07-15
Tests Voice assistants on spoken and visual cues including emotion, pitch, timbre, and ambient audio.
Best for Evaluating omni assistants that must combine paralinguistic speech with images or video.
Classification benchmark · emerging · open
Open ASR Leaderboard reference hosted
2026-07-15
Tests Speech-to-text systems across public ASR datasets and efficiency measures.
Best for Shortlisting open speech-recognition models with source-linked results.
Classification scoreboard · emerging · hosted
PBench specialized runnable
2026-07-15
Tests Pixel-level visual grounding from referring expressions.
Best for Specialist comparison of multimodal grounding and segmentation systems.
Classification benchmark · emerging · open
ScreenSpot-Pro specialized runnable
2026-07-15
Tests Visual grounding of interface elements in high-resolution professional software.
Best for Choosing vision-language models for computer-use agents.
Classification benchmark · emerging · open
Vaani Benchmark specialized runnable
2026-07-15
Tests Hindi speech recognition across real acoustic and language conditions.
Best for Selecting ASR systems for Hindi-language products.
Classification benchmark · emerging · open
Video-MME recommended runnable
2026-07-15
Tests Video understanding benchmark across temporal and multimodal questions.
Best for Video model comparison
Classification benchmark · current · open
VLABench specialized runnable
2026-07-15
Tests Vision-language-action systems on primitive robotic manipulation tasks.
Best for Comparing embodied models on reproducible task primitives.
Classification benchmark · emerging · open
Tests Speech-interaction benchmark for vocal communication and multi-round voice tasks.
Best for Speech interaction models
Classification benchmark · emerging · open
VoiceAgentBench watch runnable
2026-07-15
Tests Speech-based agentic tasks with spoken queries, tool/function specifications, multi-turn dialogue, and safety cases.
Best for Voice agents with tools
Classification agent benchmark · emerging · open
VoiceBench recommended runnable
2026-07-15
Tests LLM-based voice assistant benchmark across speech QA, reasoning, instruction following, safety, and robustness.
Best for Voice assistant model comparison
Classification benchmark · current · open
WBench specialized runnable
2026-07-15
Tests Interactive video world models across multiple behavioral dimensions and metrics.
Best for Comparing action-conditioned world models rather than passive video QA.
Classification benchmark · emerging · open
Do not stop at the public score
Turn the shortlist into a private eval Use the public sources to choose models and task formats. Then test your own traces, tools, documents, policies, and failure modes before release.